Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-06-05

State Of Uttaranchal And Ors. vs Sidharth Srivastava And Ors. ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 4062
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Uttaranchal And Ors.
Respondent
Sidharth Srivastava And Ors. ...
Author
Shivaraj V. Patil
Bench
Shivaraj V. Patil, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the recommendations made by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) prior to the formation of the State of Uttaranchal are binding on the new State under Article 323(2) of the Constitution and Section 78(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. The Court emphasized that the new reservation policy of Uttaranchal does not negate the binding nature of the UPPSC's recommendations. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision directing the State of Uttaranchal to appoint the selected candidates, affirming the legal obligation to honor the prior selection process.

State Of Uttaranchal And Ors. vs Sidharth Srivastava And Ors. ... · Niyam