Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-06-05

Sidharth Srivastava & Ors. Bharat Pal & ... vs Ravindra Pratap Singh & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sidharth Srivastava & Ors. Bharat Pal & ...
Respondent
Ravindra Pratap Singh & Ors
Author
Shivaraj V. Patil
Bench
Shivaraj V. Patil, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the recommendations made by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) prior to the formation of the State of Uttaranchal are binding on the new State under Article 323(2) of the Constitution and Section 78(4) of The Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to direct the State of Uttaranchal to appoint the selected candidates, rejecting the State's arguments regarding differing reservation policies and legal difficulties. The judgment clarified the applicability of UPPSC's recommendations to the newly formed State, emphasizing the continuity of the selection process.

Sidharth Srivastava & Ors. Bharat Pal & ... vs Ravindra Pratap Singh & Ors · Niyam