Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-07-17

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA vs INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/10080
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
Respondent
INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION .
Author
D.M. DHARMADHIKARI. DORAISWAMY RAJU
Bench
D.M. DHARMADHIKARI. DORAISWAMY RAJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the arbitration disputes between the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and the Millers, emphasizing the binding nature of the arbitration clause as per the Indian Council of Arbitration's rules. The Court held that the refusal of the ICA to proceed with arbitration due to lack of written consent from the Millers was unjustified, as the arbitration clause mandated that disputes be settled through arbitration. The Court directed that the arbitration process should continue as per the agreed terms, reinforcing the enforceability of arbitration agreements under Indian law.

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA vs INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION . · Niyam