Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-07-18

Sayeda Akhtar vs Abdul Ahad

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 2985
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sayeda Akhtar
Respondent
Abdul Ahad
Bench
V.N. Khare, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the provisions of Section 13 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, emphasizing that a tenant must file an application to condone any delay in rent deposit to avoid eviction. The Court reiterated that the discretion to extend time for deposit is not to be exercised on mere sympathy but requires sufficient cause. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to apply for condonation of delay, thus not entitled to protections under Sections 12(i)(a), 12(iii), and 13(v).

Sayeda Akhtar vs Abdul Ahad · Niyam