Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-01-27

N. BAGAVATHY AMMAL vs COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI

Citation / case number
SC 2000/9309
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
N. BAGAVATHY AMMAL
Respondent
COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
B.N. SRIKRISHNA. RUMA PAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'assets' in Section 46(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to the definition of 'capital assets' under Section 2(14). The Court held that agricultural lands are excluded from the computation of capital gains under Section 46(2) due to the exemption provided in Section 47(viii). Consequently, the Income Tax Officer's assessment including the value of agricultural lands as capital gains was set aside, affirming the lower authorities' decisions.

N. BAGAVATHY AMMAL vs COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI · Niyam