Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-01-28

NARAYAN PRASAD LOHIA vs NIKUNJ KUMAR LOHIA .

Citation / case number
SC 2000/12220
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NARAYAN PRASAD LOHIA
Respondent
NIKUNJ KUMAR LOHIA .
Bench
G.B. PATTANAIK, S.N. PHUKAN & S.N. VARIAVA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a mandatory provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be waived by the parties involved in arbitration. The Court noted that the previous judgment in Dodsal Private Ltd. vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking raised similar questions but did not resolve the issue, leading to the referral of this matter to a larger bench for clarification. The Court held that the question of waiver of mandatory provisions is significant and requires further examination by a bench of at least three judges.

NARAYAN PRASAD LOHIA vs NIKUNJ KUMAR LOHIA . · Niyam