Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-01-21

COMMMISSIONER OF POLICE,HUBLI vs R.S. MORE

Citation / case number
SC 1999/18819
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMMISSIONER OF POLICE,HUBLI
Respondent
R.S. MORE
Bench
SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, H.K. SEMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 5(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977, a probationer cannot claim deemed confirmation unless a specific order is issued declaring satisfactory completion of probation. The Court found that the respondent's continued service beyond the probation period did not entitle him to such a claim in the absence of a formal order. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order reinstating the respondent, affirming the Tribunal's dismissal of his application.

COMMMISSIONER OF POLICE,HUBLI vs R.S. MORE · Niyam