Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-02-25

RANBIR SINGH vs KARTAR SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 1997/3523
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANBIR SINGH
Respondent
KARTAR SINGH
Author
Shivaraj V. Patil
Bench
SHIVARAJ V. PATIL DORAISWAMY RAJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the suit filed by the plaintiff Surtu for possession of shares in ancestral property was barred by the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920. The Court found that the High Court correctly applied the Full Bench decision in Narotam Chand vs. Mst. Durga Devi, which established that the limitation period for such suits is governed by the Act rather than the general law under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss the suit as time-barred, reversing the concurrent findings of the lower courts.

RANBIR SINGH vs KARTAR SINGH · Niyam