Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-02-27

S.A. JALALUDDIN vs BANGALORE DEV. ATY.

Citation / case number
SC 1996/77394
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.A. JALALUDDIN
Respondent
BANGALORE DEV. ATY.
Bench
DORAISWAMY RAJU & D.M. DHARMADHIKARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision regarding the validity of the notification issued under Section 18(1)(a) of The City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945, rejecting the appellant's claim that the notification was barred by limitation under the Land Acquisition (Karnataka Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967. The Court clarified that the amendments to the Central Land Acquisition Act do not apply to the proceedings initiated under the Bangalore Act, thus affirming the authority of the Board to issue the notification. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of the acquisition proceedings.

S.A. JALALUDDIN vs BANGALORE DEV. ATY. · Niyam