Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-12-17

Bajaj Auto Ltd vs Bhojane Gopinath D. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2003 SC 808
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bajaj Auto Ltd
Respondent
Bhojane Gopinath D. & Ors
Author
B.N. Agrawal
Bench
B.N.Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the Industrial Court under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, confirming that the appellant-Company engaged in unfair labour practices as per Item Nos. 6 and 9 of Schedule IV. The Court emphasized that the rotational employment system employed by the Company was a tactic to deny workers their rights to permanency despite the availability of work of a permanent nature. The appeals by the Company were dismissed, affirming the Industrial Court's award.

Bajaj Auto Ltd vs Bhojane Gopinath D. & Ors · Niyam