Radha Raman Samanta vs Bank Of India And Ors

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the Appellant, a Badli worker, was entitled to absorption in the Respondent bank under the bipartite agreement and circular no. XVIII/90/20. The Court held that the Appellant had indeed worked as a Badli Sepoy for over 240 days and was entitled to be absorbed as a regular employee. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further consideration based on the established facts of the Appellant's employment.