Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-12-16

Collector Of Central Excise, Baroda vs L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd.

Citation / case number
AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 3309
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Collector Of Central Excise, Baroda
Respondent
L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd.
Bench
Ruma Pal, P. Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the classification of water well drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicle chassis under the Central Excise Tariff Act, specifically Tariff Heading 84.30 versus 87.05. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the rigs were correctly classified under Heading 84.30, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The Court also confirmed the limitation of the appellant's claim to specific removals supported by separate invoices, thus affirming the Tribunal's findings on the matter.

Collector Of Central Excise, Baroda vs L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd. · Niyam