Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-12-16

People'S Union For Civil Liberties & Anr vs Union Of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
People'S Union For Civil Liberties & Anr
Respondent
Union Of India
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA), ruling that Parliament has the legislative competence to enact laws addressing terrorism under Entry 1 of List I, distinct from mere public order issues under List II. The Court distinguished the case from Rehman Shagoo, asserting that terrorism threatens national sovereignty and integrity, thus justifying central legislation. The judgment reaffirmed the binding precedent set in Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, 1994, regarding Parliament's authority to legislate on matters of national security.

People'S Union For Civil Liberties & Anr vs Union Of India · Niyam