A.K. SOUMINI vs STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the promotion policy of a bank requiring a minimum of 6.5 marks in the interview for promotion, as per the provisions of the bank's policy. The Court upheld the requirement but ruled that the appellant should not be prejudiced due to the long pendency of the case, allowing her to be considered for promotion if her aggregate marks exceeded those of any selected candidates. The Court's holding emphasized the importance of justice and fairness in administrative decisions, ultimately directing the bank to implement the High Court's earlier decision favorably for the appellant.