Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-08-19

S.R.RAMARAJ vs SPECIAL COURT,BOMBAY

Citation / case number
SC 1995/16771
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.R.RAMARAJ
Respondent
SPECIAL COURT,BOMBAY
Bench
S. RAJENDRA BABU & B.N. SRIKRISHNA & G.P. MATHUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Canbank Mutual Fund for contempt of court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences relating to Transaction in Securities) Act, 1992, due to the submission of a false defense in their written statement. The Court emphasized that perjury constitutes contempt and that the tendency to file false defenses undermines judicial integrity. The appellant's apology was rejected as insincere, reinforcing the Court's stance on the seriousness of contempt proceedings.

S.R.RAMARAJ vs SPECIAL COURT,BOMBAY · Niyam