Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-08-19

Seth Mohanlal Hiralal vs State Of M.P.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2003 SC 40
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Seth Mohanlal Hiralal
Respondent
State Of M.P.
Bench
V.N. Khare, H.K. Sema, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The appellant challenged the setting aside of an arbitration award on the grounds of arbitrator misconduct. The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' findings that the arbitrator committed misconduct by ignoring relevant contract clauses and acting outside the purview of the agreement. The Court reaffirmed that failure to consider essential contractual terms constitutes misconduct under the Arbitration Act.

Seth Mohanlal Hiralal vs State Of M.P. · Niyam