ROOP KUMAR vs MOHAN THEDANI

The case involves a suit for the recovery of commissions and possession of commercial premises based on an agency-cum-licence agreement. The appellant, acting as a licensee, sought to avoid payment of commissions and vacate the premises by raising dubious legal pleas. The Supreme Court examined whether the terms of the agreement dated 15.5.1975 were binding and whether the appellant's attempts to deflect justice through factual red herrings were sustainable.