Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-04-01

The State Of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 2053
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent
Dr. Praful B. Desai
Bench
S.N. Variava, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether evidence can be recorded via video conferencing in a criminal trial. The Court ruled that the use of video conferencing is permissible and does not violate the principles of a fair trial, provided the identity of the witness is established and the court can ensure the integrity of the process. This interpretation bridges the gap between traditional procedural requirements and technological advancements in judicial administration.

The State Of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai · Niyam