Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2003

Supreme Court of India · 2003-04-02

Vip Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., ...

Citation / case number
2003(88)ECC232
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vip Industries Ltd.
Respondent
Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., ...
Bench
S.N. Variava, Brijesh Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, specifically regarding the valuation of excisable goods when equalized freight is included in the price. The Court reaffirmed the principle established in Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Limited, holding that the Department cannot include transportation costs from the factory to the depot in the computation of value for excise duty. The judgment clarified that the amended provisions of Section 4, effective from 28th February 1996, govern the valuation process, thereby upholding the exclusion of transportation costs from the price for delivery at the place of removal.

Vip Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Cus. & C. Ex., ... · Niyam