Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-09-12

Damodar J. Malpani And Anr. vs Collector Of Central Excise

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 568
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Damodar J. Malpani And Anr.
Respondent
Collector Of Central Excise
Bench
Ruma Pal, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The appellants challenged the classification of their chewing tobacco as 'manufactured tobacco' under tariff heading 24.04, contending it should be classified as 'unmanufactured tobacco' under heading 24.01. The Court noted that the classification depends on the process and composition of the product. The Court highlighted that the excise authorities ignored the appellants' request for chemical analysis to compare their product with another similarly classified product, suggesting a failure in the administrative process of classification.

Damodar J. Malpani And Anr. vs Collector Of Central Excise · Niyam