Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. vs M.R.T.P. Commission And Ors.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal against an MRTP Commission order finding the appellant guilty of restrictive trade practices. The Court upheld the Commission's decision to deny the appellant a late opportunity to lead evidence, citing the appellant's prior conduct and failure to utilize given opportunities. The Court further examined whether the findings of restrictive trade practice under Section 2(o) of the MRTP Act, 1969, were legally sustainable.