Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-05-02

Pandit Dnyanu Khot vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 438
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pandit Dnyanu Khot
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Bench
M.B. Shah, B.P. Singh, H.K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether an order granting default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. constitutes an interlocutory order that is exempt from revisional jurisdiction. The High Court had previously set aside a Sessions Judge's order by classifying the Magistrate's release order as interlocutory. The case focuses on the maintainability of revision petitions against orders relating to the release of an accused due to failure to file a charge-sheet within the statutory period.

Pandit Dnyanu Khot vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam