Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-05-03

Asstt. Director Of Inspection ... vs Kum. A.B. Shanthi

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 2188
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Asstt. Director Of Inspection ...
Respondent
Kum. A.B. Shanthi
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
R.P. Sethi, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Sections 269SS and 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which prohibit certain cash transactions and prescribe penalties for non-compliance. The primary legal issue was whether these provisions are violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court addressed whether the legislative intent to curb black money and tax evasion justifies the restrictive nature of these sections.

Asstt. Director Of Inspection ... vs Kum. A.B. Shanthi · Niyam