Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-03-20

BIBHUDATTA MOHANTY vs UNION OF INDIA .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/921
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BIBHUDATTA MOHANTY
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA .
Author
SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI
Bench
S.N. VARIAVA SYED SHAH MOHAMMMED QUADRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appointment of the appellant as Extra Departmental Mail Carrier (EDMC) was valid as it was based on merit and not solely on age. The Court emphasized that the requisition to the Employment Exchange did not specify preference for matriculates, thus the Tribunal's decision to set aside the appointment was erroneous. The Court reinstated the appellant's appointment, affirming the principles established in Union of India & Ors. Vs. N. Hargopal & Ors. [A.I.R. 1987 SC 1227].

BIBHUDATTA MOHANTY vs UNION OF INDIA . · Niyam