Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-02-20

SRI SWAMI KRISHNANAND GOVINDA NAND vs M/S.M.D.OSWAL HOSIERY(REGD.)

Citation / case number
SC 1982/63069
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRI SWAMI KRISHNANAND GOVINDA NAND
Respondent
M/S.M.D.OSWAL HOSIERY(REGD.)
Bench
SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & DORAISWAMY RAJU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 22 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, regarding the eviction of a tenant by a registered society. The Court held that an admission made by a party's counsel in court does not constitute an admission of the party itself unless it meets the criteria set forth in Section 18 of the Evidence Act. The Court found that the Additional Rent Controller's satisfaction regarding the landlord's bona fide requirement for the premises was not supported by adequate material, rendering the eviction order without jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the High Court's decision.

SRI SWAMI KRISHNANAND GOVINDA NAND vs M/S.M.D.OSWAL HOSIERY(REGD.) · Niyam