Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-02-13

M.L. Bhatt vs M.K. Pandita And Ors.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 255
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.L. Bhatt
Respondent
M.K. Pandita And Ors.
Bench
S.N. Phukan, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the FIR, emphasizing that it should only examine the allegations in the FIR without shifting materials from the investigation, as per the principles established in prior decisions. The Court clarified that the accused has the right to seek discharge at the charge framing stage if the evidence is insufficient, but not to quash the FIR based on investigative materials. The order of the Delhi High Court was set aside, allowing the criminal proceedings to continue.

M.L. Bhatt vs M.K. Pandita And Ors. · Niyam