Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-02-20

Shiv Dutt Jadiya vs Ganga Devi

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 1163
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shiv Dutt Jadiya
Respondent
Ganga Devi
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, particularly Sections 13 and 19-A, in the context of a tenant's appeal against eviction. The Court held that the tenant's compliance with Section 13(4) during the pendency of the first suit did not absolve him of the obligation to pay rent as per Section 19-A after the first suit's decision. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to restore the Trial Court's decree for eviction based on the tenant's second default, affirming the interpretation of statutory compliance required for eviction proceedings under the Act.

Shiv Dutt Jadiya vs Ganga Devi · Niyam