Rama Kant And Ors vs Sona Devi

The Supreme Court addressed whether a tenant can benefit from the first proviso to Section 13(2) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 when arrears of rent are paid by a third party, specifically the tenant's son. The Court held that the acceptance of rent by the landlord, even if done 'without prejudice', constitutes a valid tender under the Act, thereby protecting the tenant from eviction. The appeal was allowed, overturning the lower court's decision that had dismissed the tenant's claim.