Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-02-27

Laxman vs State Of Maharashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Laxman
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
JUDGMENT PATTANAIK
Bench
M.B. Shah, Doraiswamy Raju, S.N. Variava

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the admissibility of dying declarations in criminal cases, specifically referencing the conflicting decisions in Paparambaka Rosamma & Ors. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (1999) and Koli Chunilal Savji & Another vs. State of Gujarat (1999). The Court emphasized that a dying declaration can be accepted if the deceased was conscious and capable of making a statement, even if the doctor did not explicitly certify the mental fitness. The matter was referred to a Constitution Bench to resolve the conflict between the two prior judgments, without delving into the specifics of the case at hand.

Laxman vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam