Ayyub vs State Of U.P

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of the appellants under Sections 3(1)(2)(i) of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, and Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court emphasized that the use of explosives in a public place constituted a grave threat to public safety, justifying the application of TADA. The sentences of life imprisonment and fines imposed by the Designated Judge were affirmed, reinforcing the seriousness of the offenses committed.