Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-20

M.C. ABRAHAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHATRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/1070
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.C. ABRAHAM
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA .
Author
B.P. SINGH. N. SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
B.P. SINGH. N. SANTOSH HEGDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from orders of the Bombay High Court concerning the inaction of the State against Directors of Maharashtra Antibiotics & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (MAPL) in response to a complaint by the Provident Fund Commissioner alleging offences under Sections 406 and 409/34 IPC. The Court emphasized the need for the State to act on the complaint and directed the arrest of the accused Directors, holding that the High Court's intervention was justified due to the lack of progress in the investigation. The Court reaffirmed the principle that government officials should not evade accountability under criminal law, particularly in cases involving public interest.

M.C. ABRAHAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHATRA . · Niyam