Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

RENUKA DATLA vs COMNR. OF INCOME TAX KARNATAKA

Citation / case number
SC 1999/19058
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RENUKA DATLA
Respondent
COMNR. OF INCOME TAX KARNATAKA
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
RUMA PAL & B.N. SRIKRISHNA.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of the 'Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998' under the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, specifically focusing on the definitions and conditions outlined in Sections 87(m), 88, 89, and 95. The Court held that tax arrears must be determined before 31st March 1998 and remain unpaid at the time of declaration to qualify for settlement under the scheme. It clarified that the modification of tax determinations does not need to be completed by the specified date, thus upholding the appellants' right to declare their tax arrears under the scheme despite the rejection by the Respondent.

RENUKA DATLA vs COMNR. OF INCOME TAX KARNATAKA · Niyam