Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

SUSHILA vs IIND ADDITIONAL DIST.JUDGE BANDA

Citation / case number
SC 1997/16095
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUSHILA
Respondent
IIND ADDITIONAL DIST.JUDGE BANDA
Author
BRIJESH KUMAR
Bench
BRIJESH KUMAR. R.C.LAHOTI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the application of Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, regarding the eviction of a tenant based on the landlord's bonafide need. The Court held that the landlady's need to vacate the shop for her son to start a business was genuine, and the appellate court's finding of greater hardship for the tenant was not substantiated. Consequently, the Supreme Court reversed the High Court's dismissal and upheld the trial court's order for eviction, emphasizing the importance of bonafide need in tenancy disputes.

SUSHILA vs IIND ADDITIONAL DIST.JUDGE BANDA · Niyam