Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-10

State Bank Of Hyderabad vs Pennar Patoruon Ltd. And Anr.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 432
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Bank Of Hyderabad
Respondent
Pennar Patoruon Ltd. And Anr.
Author
Chief Justice
Bench
Chief Justice

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether prior leave from the Company Judge is necessary for a Commissioner appointed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 19(1)(e) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, to prepare an inventory of properties of a company under liquidation. The Court held that the Tribunal's authority is not undermined by the Company Judge's supervisory jurisdiction, and thus, the Tribunal can appoint a Commissioner without needing prior approval from the Company Judge. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's decision that required such leave.

State Bank Of Hyderabad vs Pennar Patoruon Ltd. And Anr. · Niyam