Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors vs Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 839
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors
Respondent
Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income ...
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, B.N. Srikrishna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the 'Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998' under the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, specifically Sections 87(m), 88, 89, and 95. The Court held that tax arrears eligible for settlement must be determined before 31st March 1998 and remain unpaid at the time of declaration, clarifying that the modification of tax assessments does not need to be completed by that date. The Court concluded that the appellants' declarations were improperly rejected as they met the criteria set forth in the Scheme.

Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors vs Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income ... · Niyam