Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-03

Nagappa vs Gurudayal Singh & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 674
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nagappa
Respondent
Gurudayal Singh & Ors
Bench
M.B. Shah, B. P. Singh, H.K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a one-time compensation payment is sufficient for future medical expenses under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically referencing Section 166. The Court held that while lump-sum compensation can be granted, it is permissible to award recurring medical expenses based on the victim's future needs. Additionally, the Court ruled that amendments to the claim petition for enhanced compensation can be allowed at the appellate stage, emphasizing that compensation should be just and not limited to the initially claimed amount.

Nagappa vs Gurudayal Singh & Ors · Niyam