Dr. Prabha Atri vs The State Of U.P. & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the letter dated 9.1.1999 from the appellant, which expressed dissatisfaction with the hospital's actions and indicated an intention to resign, did not constitute a formal resignation under Service Rule 10(i). The Court emphasized that an intention to resign must be clear and unequivocal, and in this case, the appellant's communication was ambiguous. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and reinstated the appellant, affirming her right to a fair hearing before any disciplinary action could be taken against her.