Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers, M/S Damani ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2003 SUPREME COURT 3942
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Income Tax
Respondent
M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers, M/S Damani ...
Author
M.B. Shah
Bench
M.B. Shah

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the provisions of the Income Tax Act, specifically Sections 245A, 245B, 245C, and 245D, regarding the payment of interest on undisclosed income disclosed before the Income Tax Settlement Commission. It held that interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C is mandatory and cannot be waived or reduced by the Commission, as established in Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum Ghaswala [(2002) 1 SCC 633]. The Court affirmed that the assessee must pay interest from the date the tax amount became due on the undisclosed income disclosed to the Commission.

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers, M/S Damani ... · Niyam