Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

Harish Uppal (Ex-Captain) vs Union Of India And Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Harish Uppal (Ex-Captain)
Respondent
Union Of India And Anr
Author
S.N. Variava
Bench
M.B.Shah, Doraiswamy Raju, S.N.Variava, D.M.Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of strikes and boycotts by lawyers, emphasizing that while the Bar Council of India opposes strikes except in rare cases, individual lawyers must retain the right to practice without coercion. The Court held that any call for a strike must allow members the freedom to appear in court without facing adverse consequences. The judgment underscores the balance between the rights of lawyers and the need to maintain the dignity of the judiciary and the legal profession, establishing that strikes should be avoided to prevent hardship to litigants.

Harish Uppal (Ex-Captain) vs Union Of India And Anr · Niyam