Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union Of India & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal
Respondent
Union Of India & Anr
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
Chief Justice, Doraiswamy Raju, S. N. Variava, D. M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of strikes and boycotts by lawyers, determining that while the legal profession may have a right to strike, it should only be exercised in rare circumstances involving the dignity and independence of the judiciary. The Court emphasized that any call for a strike must allow individual lawyers the freedom to practice without coercion. The interim measures proposed were aimed at minimizing hardship to the litigant public, thereby balancing the rights of lawyers with their professional responsibilities.

Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union Of India & Anr · Niyam