Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-17

Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors vs Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income; ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors
Respondent
Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income; ...
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal, B.N. Srikrishna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the 'Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998' as outlined in Chapter IV of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, specifically Sections 87(m), 88, 89, and 95. The Court held that tax arrears eligible for settlement must have been determined before 31st March 1998 and remain unpaid at the time of declaration, clarifying that the modification of tax assessments does not need to be completed by that date. The Court concluded that the scheme's benefits are only available when appeals or revisions are pending, thus rejecting the appellants' declarations due to non-compliance with these conditions.

Dr. (Mrs.) Renuka Datla & Ors vs Ckoamrmniastsaikoane&Raonfr.Income; ... · Niyam