Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-12-03

The State Of Tripura & Anr vs Roopchand Das & Ors., Sudhir Debnath & ...

Citation / case number
2002 AIR SCW 4859
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Tripura & Anr
Respondent
Roopchand Das & Ors., Sudhir Debnath & ...
Bench
Doraiswamy Raju, Shivaraj V. Patil

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the period of limitation for seeking re-determination of compensation should be calculated from the latest award of the Reference Court, not the earliest. The Court found that the Land Acquisition Collector's interpretation, which rejected claims based on the earliest award, was incorrect and upheld the High Court's decision to direct the Collector to consider the petitions on merits. The judgment clarified the legal principle that the right to apply for re-determination arises from the award relevant to the claim, establishing a precedent for future cases.

The State Of Tripura & Anr vs Roopchand Das & Ors., Sudhir Debnath & ... · Niyam