Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-08-06

Pratap Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2002 SC 466
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pratap Singh
Respondent
State Of Himachal Pradesh
Bench
Chief Justice, K.G. Balakrishnan, Arjit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an accused against whom an order under Section 9 of the Probation of Offenders Act has been passed must have access to a judicial remedy. The Court found that the Himachal Pradesh High Court erred in dismissing the appeal as not maintainable and directed that the appeal should be treated as a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for a merits decision. The Court emphasized that the nomenclature of the remedy is less important than the availability of a judicial recourse for the accused.

Pratap Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh · Niyam