Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-08-01

Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat . Respondent

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 2784
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah
Respondent
State Of Gujarat . Respondent
Author
P.Venkatarama Reddi
Bench
D.P. Mohapatra, P.Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the non-production of a sanction order under Section 196(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code affects the committal proceedings to the Court of Sessions. The Court held that the Magistrate's committal of the case does not require taking cognizance of the offence, thus the absence of sanction at that stage does not invalidate the proceedings. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the ban under Section 196(1) does not apply to committal proceedings, allowing the prosecution to continue.

Dharmesh @ Nanu Nitinbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat . Respondent · Niyam