Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-04-30

STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MADAN MOHAN GHOSH .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/15409
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Respondent
MADAN MOHAN GHOSH .
Author
SANTOSH HEGDE
Bench
N. SANTOSH HEGDE & SHIVARAJ V. PATIL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision that Rule 17 of the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of Licence for Retail Sale of Spirit and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 1993 has an overriding effect, allowing holders of existing excise licences to apply for additional licences despite the restrictions imposed by the West Bengal Excise (Selection of Persons for Grant of License at New Sites for Retail Sale of Spirit and certain other Intoxicants other than foreign liquor) Order, 2000. The Court found that the State's policy to limit the concentration of excise licences does not constitute a fundamental right infringement. The appeal by the State of West Bengal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs MADAN MOHAN GHOSH . · Niyam