Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2002

Supreme Court of India · 2002-04-04

Nirmal And Navin P. Ltd. And Ors. vs D. Ravindran

Citation / case number
AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT 3576
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nirmal And Navin P. Ltd. And Ors.
Respondent
D. Ravindran
Bench
M.B. Shah, Bisheshwar Prasad Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 245H of the Income-tax Act, the Settlement Commission has the authority to grant immunity from prosecution and penalties if a full and true disclosure of income is made. The Court emphasized that the immunity granted is conclusive and cannot be reopened under any law, as per Section 245-I. The Court quashed the criminal complaint against the appellants, affirming that the immunity extends to the matters covered by the settlement, including fictitious transactions with Express Newspapers Ltd.

Nirmal And Navin P. Ltd. And Ors. vs D. Ravindran · Niyam