Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-07

SRIKANT TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 1994/72754
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRIKANT TRIPATHI
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
RUMA PAL G.B. PATTANAIK
Bench
RUMA PAL G.B. PATTANAIK

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute between direct recruits and promotees in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service under the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975, framed under Article 309 and Article 233 of the Constitution. The Court held that the calculation of the ratio between direct recruits and promotees must be interpreted according to the relevant provisions of the rules, allowing the High Court to recalibrate appointments accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the defined quota for recruitment as specified in Rule 6 of the 1975 Rules.

SRIKANT TRIPATHI vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam