Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-28

Harsh Dhingra vs State Of Haryana & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3795
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Harsh Dhingra
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Ors
Bench
S. Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju, K.G. Balakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed multiple appeals concerning the interpretation of various provisions under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, particularly focusing on Section 2(oo) regarding the definition of 'retrenchment'. The Court established that the termination of service due to the closure of a business does not constitute retrenchment under the Act, thereby clarifying the scope of employee rights during business closures. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's decisions.

Harsh Dhingra vs State Of Haryana & Ors · Niyam