Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-07

Sri Kant Tripathi & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3757
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sri Kant Tripathi & Ors
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Ors
Author
Ruma Pal
Bench
Ruma Pal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the dispute between direct recruits and promotees in the U.P. Higher Judicial Service, interpreting the U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 framed under the proviso to Article 309 and Article 233 of the Constitution. The Court held that the calculation of the ratio between direct recruits and promotees must adhere to the defined quotas in Rule 6, which stipulates a 15% quota for direct recruitment from the Bar and a 70% quota from U.P. Nyayik Sewa. The Court directed the High Court to recalculate and readjust appointments based on this interpretation, without delving into the specifics of past calculations.

Sri Kant Tripathi & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors · Niyam