Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2001

Supreme Court of India · 2001-09-05

M/S. Aspinwall & Co. Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2001 SUPREME COURT 3708
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Aspinwall & Co. Ltd
Respondent
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ...
Author
Ashok Bhan
Bench
S.P. Bharucha, Ashok Bhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'manufacturing' under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of coffee curing activities. The Court upheld the High Court's ruling that the assessee's coffee curing did not qualify as manufacturing, thus denying the investment allowance claimed under Section 32A. The judgment clarified that the process of curing coffee does not meet the legal definition of manufacturing as required for tax relief.

M/S. Aspinwall & Co. Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... · Niyam